Durham, NC ~ Local leaders from across the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast Region met Feb 19-20, 2011 to explore the topic of teacher effectiveness through a panel discussion; plus presentations on assessment systems for schools and unions.
Leaders from 12 locals from 4 states attended (3 from Virginia, 2 from Maryland, 1 from Georgia, and 6 from North Carolina). Including panelists and presenters, there were 43 participants - the largest presence as well as diversity/local representation at MASE-TURN ever!!
Day One featured a panel of distinguished educators providing a wide range of perspectives on teacher effectiveness.

From left to right:
- Elena Silva, Senior Policy Analyst, The Education Sector
- Adriane Dorrington, Senior Policy Analyst, National Education Association
- Jo Anderson, Senior Policy Advisor to the Secretary of Education, U.S. Department of Education
- Carolyn McKinney, Executive Director of the NC Professional Teaching Standards Commission (former President of NCAE)
- Kitty Boitnott, President of the Virginia Education Association.
- Brad Jupp, Senior Program Advisor and Teacher Quality Advisor, U.S. Department of Education
- Melissa Rasberry, Director of Project Management, Center for Teaching Quality
After the Q&A, local teams were given time to discuss the implications of what they had just heard in terms of next steps for their respective locals.
Day Two was framed by two presentations:
- What makes an effective school? Jacques Nacson, Senior Policy Analyist with NEA's Quality School Programs and Resources Department, presented NEA's Keys to Excellence for Your School (KEYS) an assessment system and approach to continuous school improvement, and provided comparisons to other assessment systems.
- What makes an effective local? Mary McDonald, Consortium for Educational Change & Great Lakes TURN Co-Facilitator, explained the Three Frames of Unionism and shared the findings from an online survey is designed to assess members' needs and concerns around the three distinct aspects of teacher unionism (click here to see a video of Mary discussing the three frames).
At the end of the meeting, local action plans were posted in the Follow-Up Forum. Click here for a meeting summary produced by Mary McDonald.


Comments
This has been an amazing Forum! Please follow the conversation and access links via our Facebook and Twitter feeds:
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=57037533523
TWITTER: http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23MASETURN
All the info, including several good pictures have been posted in both places.
TRIPP JEFFERS, President, Forsyth County Assn of Educators
NCUEA Executive Committee, Eastern US Regional Director
Chatham County's attendance was very last-minute and I didn't know what to expect. The national discourse is centered on reform and it's time that educators are heard and advocate to be a part of the solution rather than the scapegoat for the problems.
Listening to the perspectives of our Mid-Atlantic SouthEast family members affirmed my decision to come to North Carolina to teach. We have programs and policies already in place that seem to me to be leading the way. The McRel teacher evaluation instrument and the Teacher Working Conditions survey are valuable tools that are worth replicating and/or modifying to suit the needs of our neighbors. That said, as I shared with Brad, I think we need to share our perspectives locally with what can be done after we evaluation. Looking at the McRel as an assets-based evaluation rather than deficit-model is one direction that I am going to suggest to my administrator at the school level and with my Association Representatives as the county association level.
Discussions were very helpful in expanding a framework for change. While I see the Social Justice framework as Utopian, we can certainly move into the Teacher Quality framework.
This meeting provided a wonderful opportunity to assemble with leaders to share ideas and talk about the issues surrounding the profession. The discussions were very helpful and offered insights and perspective on politics, organizing, teacher evaluation, working conditions surveys, quality schools, education funding and colaboration.
I was particularily interested in the working conditions survey and the Keys Program. We have used the Working Conditions Survey in Fairfax County in partnership with the school system. I plan to explore how the survey can be used more effectively in addressing the workload issues facing our members. The Keys Survey was of particular interest because of the support staff component.
The big takeaway from the meeting was the fact that we need to do business differently. Collaboration is the word of the day. The practitioners must be at the table in planning, designing and implementation of initiatives, programs, teacher evaluation instruments, etc. When we are included in the process, reform yields better results.
The winter 2011 meeting of MASE-TURN couldn't have happened on a better weekend. With the protests in Madison just getting under way, the way forward was made perfectly clear: unless educators become actively involved in the process of remaking our public schools, we will be the main target of "reform."
For right or wrong, the conversations we had that weekend--about teacher evaluation, alternative pay, high-stakes testing--are the essential conversations of our time. It is our job, as experts in our field, to take control of the national dialogue about the future of public education. If we can bring local decision makers to the table with us, we can really get things done this summer.
In the meantime, I’d like to learn more about: the outreach programs run by ODE; the work it took to bring AFT & NEA together in Fairfax County, VA; and the bridge-building between FCAE and the Forsyth BOE and Administration.
Login to comment